Neurodivergent humor: Why was it funny on TV but awkward in person?

Essy Knopf neurodivergent humor
Reading time: 3 minutes

You repeat a line that got a huge laugh on television, only for people to look suddenly conversation, and for the conversation to move on without you. Apparently, the joke works when that character says it, but sounds rude coming from you.

What changed?

I ran into this growing up exposed to sitcoms like Seinfeld. The characters said things I already thought about everyday life: how strange people could be, how awkward social expectations were. Sometimes I didn’t understand why it was funny. To me, they were pointing out the obvious.

But people clearly enjoyed it. I took that as permission to be equally direct, and sometimes borrowed jokes for my own conversations. The response was often nothing like the one on television.

Television leaves out part of the lesson

A sitcom gives us information that an ordinary conversation doesn’t. We know the characters and expect them to entertain us. We may be laughing at someone’s poor judgment rather than agreeing with what they said.

Watching as a young person, I didn’t always make that distinction. I heard the laugh and understood the line as socially approved.

In person, the listener has to work out what you mean without that context. They may hear a criticism where you intended a playful observation. If they don’t know you well, they have little reason to assume you’re being ironic.

Delivery matters too. A line said with exaggerated disbelief can sound different in a flat voice. That doesn’t make a flat delivery wrong; deadpan humor can be wonderful. It does mean the words alone won’t necessarily communicate that you’re joking.

This isn’t unique to neurodivergent humor, but it can be a frustrating discovery if you’ve been borrowing dialogue to help you navigate conversations.

Sometimes the problem really is the joke

There’s another part of this that’s harder to talk about. Sometimes a joke lands badly because it was insensitive.

In my twenties, before my autism diagnosis, a colleague told me about a puppy that had died in a preventable accident. I responded with a joke about natural selection.

I regret saying it. An animal had suffered, and I treated the story as an opportunity to make a clever remark.

I love dogs. That’s part of why the memory still bothers me: what I said communicated something so far from what I felt. But the people listening only had my words to go on. They couldn’t see the care for animals that I assumed was obvious.

I can understand my nervousness and limited awareness at the time while acknowledging that the comment was cruel. My diagnosis gives me context for some of my communication difficulties. It doesn’t make that joke harmless.

What “read the room” actually asks us to do

“Read the room” is frustrating advice when you need someone to explain what you’re supposed to notice.

A more useful starting point is to consider what the person has just shared. Are they joking about an everyday inconvenience, or telling you about something painful? If they’re describing a loss, responding to that loss gives you a clearer starting point than searching for a punchline.

It also helps to ask who the joke is aimed at. Making fun of a confusing parking sign is different from making fun of someone who is already embarrassed. A joke that works with a close friend may need more trust than you’ve established with a colleague.

For me, spontaneity is part of the pleasure of humor. Pausing can feel cumbersome, especially when the line arrives fully formed and I want to say it immediately. I’ve had to learn that having a funny association doesn’t oblige me to share it.

Which is not to say that it requires require reviewing every sentence before speaking. I’m more careful around fresh grief and subjects where I don’t know the other person’s experience. Those are useful places to slow down.

Essy Knopf neurodivergent humor

Repairing a joke without making excuses

If I realize I’ve said something hurtful, I try to name it plainly: “That was insensitive. I’m sorry. I shouldn’t have joked about that.”

Explaining that I meant to be funny adds little. The problem is already that I tried to be funny at the wrong moment.

Sometimes I only understand the impact later. I can still acknowledge it when appropriate, without asking the person to reassure me that I’m good or forgive me immediately.

These memories can become shame hangovers: incidents I revisit long after I’ve understood what went wrong. When that happens, I try to return to the specific lesson. I know why that comment was hurtful, and I’ve changed how I respond to similar situations. Repeatedly insulting myself won’t improve the repair.

Wrap Up

I still like my dry sense of humor. I enjoy noticing the absurdity of things, and I value people who share that enjoyment.

What I understand better now is that a joke happens between people. Whether it works depends partly on what they know about me and what’s happening for them. Learning to consider that has helped me keep the humor while becoming more thoughtful about where I use it.

Have you ever borrowed a joke from television and discovered it sounded very different in real life?

Shame hangovers: When a social moment stays with you for years

Essy Knopf shame hangovers
Reading time: 3 minutes

You’re halfway through an ordinary day when you remember something you said ten years ago. Your stomach drops. You cringe, despite knowing that everyone involved may have long since forgotten it.

Or perhaps the conversation happened yesterday. Someone’s expression changed after you spoke, and you’ve been trying to work out why ever since.

I’ve started calling this a shame “hangover:” the shame that lingers after a social interaction has ended. It’s a description of an experience, rather than a clinical term. For some autistic and ADHD adults, the replay can become more painful than the original exchange.

When uncertainty becomes self-blame

Sometimes we know what went wrong. We might have interrupted someone or made a comment we later recognized as hurtful.

Other times, we have very little information. Someone looked away, and we interpreted it as disapproval. A pause felt like rejection. Those reactions might mean something, but they don’t tell us exactly what the other person was thinking.

If you’ve often been misunderstood, it can be difficult to leave that uncertainty alone. You end up searching the conversation for an explanation and land on yourself: I made it awkward. I always do this.

An uncomfortable exchange becomes evidence about who you are. Once that happens, reviewing the details may turn into another opportunity to criticize yourself.

A rejection I carried for years

When I was around nineteen or twenty, I met a woman at a social event and thought we were getting along well. At the end of our conversation, I asked whether we could exchange numbers.

She said no.

I laughed awkwardly and walked away, feeling my stomach drop. I’m gay, and I’d been thinking about friendship. It hadn’t occurred to me that she might interpret the request as romantic interest. I assumed my intentions were obvious because they were obvious to me.

Looking back, that’s one possible explanation. I don’t actually know why she declined, and she didn’t owe me her number or an explanation.

What stayed with me was the feeling that I’d done something wrong without understanding what it was. I became tearful afterward. The person I was dating told me to move on, and someone else I confided in called me an “idiot.”

I needed help making sense of the interaction. Instead, those responses gave me more to feel ashamed of.

Months later, the woman greeted me at another event. I remember feeling so uncomfortable that I didn’t want to risk trying again. By then, that brief exchange had become something much bigger in my mind.

Essy Knopf shame hangovers

An awkward moment and a harmful action need different responses

Asking once to exchange numbers and accepting a “no” isn’t inherently wrongdoing. But I’ve also said things that were hurtful, including comments I now recognize as prejudiced.

Those situations require more than reassuring myself that I meant well.

Being neurodivergent can provide context for an interaction. It doesn’t establish why every mistake happened, and it doesn’t make someone else’s hurt disappear. I can acknowledge what I said, consider whether an apology would help, and change how I behave.

The difficulty comes when taking responsibility turns into repeatedly declaring myself a terrible person. At that point, I may be spending more time judging myself than understanding what needs to change.

Self-compassion allows me to be specific: That comment was hurtful. I understand why now, and I can respond differently. I don’t need to minimize it or keep punishing myself to prove I care.

What to do when the memory returns

Start by asking what you know. Did someone tell you they were hurt, or are you trying to interpret an expression? Both can feel upsetting, but they leave you with different information.

If there’s a clear action to take, make it proportionate. An apology might name what you said and acknowledge its impact without asking the other person to reassure you. For an incident from years ago, consider whether renewed contact would benefit them or mainly relieve your own discomfort.

If you’ve already addressed it, ask whether another replay is giving you anything new. You might remind yourself: “I’ve thought about this. I know what I’d do differently.” Then return to what you were doing, even if some discomfort remains.

It can also help to talk with someone who can offer perspective without insulting you or automatically insisting you did nothing wrong. You deserve room to understand a mistake without having your whole character reduced to it.

Wrap Up

Shame hangovers can make withdrawing feel safer than risking another difficult interaction. I understand that impulse. After enough painful experiences, even an invitation to connect can bring up memories of what happened before.

What has helped me is learning to look more fairly at those memories. Sometimes I needed to take responsibility. Sometimes I was confused or rejected, and treated that as proof I was defective. Recognizing the difference has made it easier to forgive myself.

Do old social moments return when you least expect them?

Misophonia and the sounds we can’t mute

Essy Knopf misophonia
Reading time: 2 minutes

Someone beside you is chewing, and suddenly it’s all you can hear. You can’t follow the conversation, because each mouth sound makes you more tense. Nobody else seems bothered, which makes it awkward to explain why you need to move away.

For people with misophonia, everyday “human” sounds like these can make sharing a meal difficult. Online, those same noises are sometimes amplified for an audience that finds them relaxing.

Mukbang videos, which feature people eating on camera, bring that contrast into focus. Some viewers enjoy the chewing and lip-smacking. Others reach for the mute button.

I find myself caught between wanting to watch and wanting to switch them off.

When a sound provokes more than annoyance

Misophonia involves a decreased tolerance for particular sounds or associated cues, which can bring on intense emotional and physical reactions. Eating sounds are common triggers, though the sounds that affect one person may not bother another. The reaction is tied to the specific sound or its meaning, rather than simply how loud it is.

For me, the response can feel like rage. I hear the noise and feel an immediate urge to get away from it.

Chewing and slurping are difficult, but other human sounds can catch me off guard too. Repeated sniffing, for example, or the little noises someone makes to show they’re listening. I can’t always predict what will bother me until it happens.

That can make social situations uncomfortable in ways other people don’t necessarily see. They’re carrying on with a conversation while I’m trying to manage my reaction to a sound they may barely notice.

Essy Knopf misophonia

A shared meal is harder to mute

The strange part is that I find the visual side of these videos genuinely appealing.

I love chewy textures. Mochi and gummies have a physical quality I enjoy, and watching someone bite into them brings that sensation to mind.

Online, I can switch off the sound. At a dinner table, it’s more complicated.

When I briefly lived in China, slurping was common in the dining settings I encountered. I found it difficult enough that I sometimes wanted to eat alone. The people around me were eating in a way that was ordinary for them, while I was becoming overwhelmed.

That distinction matters. My response to a sound doesn’t automatically mean the person making it is being inconsiderate. Equally, knowing they aren’t doing anything wrong doesn’t make the sound easier to tolerate.

It helps to explain what’s happening without making someone’s eating habits the entire problem: “Certain mouth sounds are really difficult for me. Could we put some music on?” Depending on the setting, sitting farther away or taking a short break might also make the meal more manageable.

Those adjustments won’t work for everyone. The point is to make a shared meal more comfortable without turning it into an argument about whether a sound should bother you.

Wrap Up

For now, the mute button lets me enjoy the mochi without the chewing. In person, I have to be more deliberate about what I need and how I communicate it.

I can want someone’s company and still struggle with the sound of them eating. Recognizing both makes it easier to explain why I might need an adjustment or a break.

Do you experience misophonia? How do you cope with it?

Why neurodivergent self-silencing can leave you exhausted

Essy Knopf neurodivergent self-silencing
Reading time: 3 minutes

You agree to stay a little longer, even though the restaurant noise is making it hard to think. Your friend wants to tell you something, and you don’t want them to feel brushed off. So you keep listening and hope they finish soon.

Later, you’re exhausted and irritated. You wanted to spend time with them, but you also wanted to leave half an hour ago.

This is one way neurodivergent self-silencing can show up: you hold back what you need because someone else’s possible disappointment feels more urgent. Sometimes you agree so quickly that you only recognize your discomfort afterward.

How holding back your needs becomes a habit

If people have repeatedly taken your needs personally, you may start treating those needs as something you have to explain carefully.

Asking for quiet becomes an apology, while leaving a gathering requires reassurance that you had a good time. You might even stay somewhere uncomfortable because saying nothing seems easier than convincing someone you aren’t rejecting them.

This can overlap with masking, particularly when you’re concealing discomfort or managing your expression to meet social expectations. Those adjustments may help you get through an interaction, which is part of what makes them difficult to reconsider.

Other people’s responses can reinforce the habit. Someone may describe you as easygoing without realizing how often you’re agreeing to things you don’t want.

After a while, you can find yourself wondering whether they would still enjoy your company if you asked for more.

Caring can take effort without being fake

Some autistic and ADHD adults need time to work out what they feel or how they want to respond. If a friend shares something painful while you’re overwhelmed, you may care about them and still struggle to find words.

Choosing a thoughtful response doesn’t make your concern artificial. Nor does needing a moment mean you lack empathy.

The pressure comes when you believe you must respond immediately, regardless of your capacity. You start worrying about whether your face looks sympathetic enough instead of listening to what the person is saying. Meanwhile, your own need for a pause goes unspoken.

A flat voice or quiet expression doesn’t necessarily reveal how much you care. You might be concentrating or tired; it may simply be how you communicate.

Saying, “I’m listening; I just need a moment to take that in,” gives the other person some context without requiring you to conceal what’s happening for you.

The difficult part is allowing disappointment

When you’re accustomed to holding back, another person’s disappointment can feel like evidence that you should have kept quiet.

But a friend can wish you’d stayed longer and still respect your decision to leave. You can care about that disappointment without changing your answer.

Waiting until nobody minds your boundary may mean never setting it. Even considerate people won’t always want the same thing you do.

What tells you more is how they respond. Do they accept your answer, even reluctantly? Or do they keep pressing until you give in?

You can explain your needs clearly. The other person’s willingness to respect them remains their responsibility.

Essy Knopf neurodivergent self-silencing

Give yourself time before agreeing

A useful place to begin is with the moment before your automatic yes.

“I’ll check and get back to you” gives you time to consider whether you actually want to go and what it would require. You don’t have to decide while watching someone’s face for signs of disappointment.

For plans you do want, try stating a limit early: “I’d love to come. I can stay for about an hour.” That may feel easier than waiting until you’re overwhelmed and trying to explain why you suddenly need to leave.

If you notice your discomfort only afterward, that information still helps. You might realize that dinner works better somewhere quieter, or that you need a shorter visit next time. You can use what you learned without criticizing yourself for not speaking up sooner.

Start with someone who has shown they can respect a request. You don’t need to disclose more or drop protective habits around someone who repeatedly punishes you for expressing needs.

When a person accepts your limit, give yourself a chance to notice. You asked for something, and the relationship continued. You don’t have to follow that with an apology.

Wrap Up

Neurodivergent self-silencing can be difficult to notice when you’ve become used to checking what everyone else wants first. Making room for your own needs starts with considering them before you commit.

The next time you feel yourself saying yes automatically, give yourself a moment. You may still choose yes, but you’ll have had a chance to include yourself in the decision.

When do you find it hardest to say what you need?

Why do I always have to explain myself? Autism, ADHD, and being misunderstood

Essy Knopf neurodivergent overexplaining
Reading time: 4 minutes

Have you ever left a conversation feeling fine, then started wondering whether something you said sounded rude?

By the time you get home, you’re considering sending a message to explain yourself. You don’t actually know whether the other person was offended. And yet leaving it alone feels risky.

For many autistic and ADHD adults, being misunderstood is familiar enough that we start preparing for it before it happens.

For example, we may qualify a question so it doesn’t sound like criticism. Or we may explain why we need time alone, then reassure the person that we enjoyed seeing them. Sometimes the explanation gets longer than whatever we originally wanted to say.

It can be hard to enjoy their company when we’re also reviewing our own performance.

When you start questioning your own intentions

There’s a difference between knowing you’re interested and knowing how to make that interest recognizable to someone else in a social interaction.

You might look away because it helps you listen, then remember that someone once accused you of ignoring them for doing exactly that. So you make yourself look back, even though you’re now finding it harder to follow the conversation.

Your attention shifts from what works for you to what will reassure them.

American sociologist and writer W. E. B. Du Bois explored a particular form of divided self-awareness through his concept of double consciousness: the experience of being Black in a racist society and seeing oneself through the judgments of the dominant white culture.

Although rooted in a distinct experience of racism, his account offers a useful way to think about neurodivergent masking: how we can become so accustomed to seeing ourselves through other people’s judgments that we begin to distrust our own understanding of ourselves.

You know you asked a sincere question, but someone heard a challenge. Now you’re wondering whether you were being difficult without realizing it.

When this happens repeatedly, knowing what you meant can stop feeling like enough. You start anticipating how you’ll be interpreted and adjusting yourself before you’ve even spoken.

How you end up doing the repair work

If your questions were treated as backtalk growing up, it makes sense that you might explain why you’re asking. If people regularly mistook your expression for anger, you may have learned to smile when you didn’t feel like smiling.

Those adjustments may have helped. They may still help. The difficulty is that you can become accustomed to making them whether or not the person in front of you needs them.

A friend gets quiet, and you start searching for what you did wrong. Perhaps they’re tired. Perhaps something you said did bother them. You don’t yet know, but you’re already working on an apology.

This is where I think we need to ask more of the people around us.

Autistic researcher Damian Milton’s double empathy problem describes how autistic and non-autistic people can struggle to understand each other across differences in experience and perspective.

It challenges the assumption that a misunderstanding must originate with the autistic person. The framework was developed around autism, though the question of shared effort may also resonate with ADHD readers.

Consider what happens when someone assumes your directness means you’re annoyed. You can explain what you meant, but they also need to be willing to reconsider their interpretation. If they continue treating their first impression as more reliable than your explanation, there’s a limit to what further explaining can accomplish.

Of course, we can hurt people without intending to. And we still need to listen when someone tells us that happened. But there should be room in that conversation for them to listen to us, too.

The conversation ends, but you’re still in it

Sometimes the most tiring part comes after social interactions. You’re making dinner and remembering a pause before someone answered you. You wonder whether you interrupted them. You pick up your phone, reread the message you’ve drafted, and decide it sounds excessive.

Then you wonder whether saying nothing would be worse.

Overexplaining can become a way of trying to settle that uncertainty. If you provide enough context, perhaps you can prevent someone from coming away with an impression of you that feels painfully wrong.

But you can’t always explain your way into feeling certain about what another person thinks. And the more time you spend trying, the less attention you may have for your own experience of the interaction.

Did you enjoy yourself? Were you comfortable? Did they make an effort to understand you?

These are questions that deserve some consideration before you spend hours deciding how to make yourself easier for others.

Letting someone else do their part

I don’t think “just stop caring what people think” is particularly helpful advice here. Other people’s judgments can affect our relationships and our jobs. Some of us have good reasons to be careful.

A more manageable starting point is to notice when you’re responding to something that happened and when you’re responding to something you fear happened. Another person’s short reply might make you uneasy, but it doesn’t tell you much by itself.

With someone you trust, you could ask, “Did that come across differently from how I intended?” That gives them a chance to tell you, rather than leaving you to construct both sides of the conversation.

You can also ask for an adjustment that would make future conversations easier: “Sometimes my voice sounds flat when I’m concentrating. If you think I’m upset, please ask.”

Then notice what they do with that information. Someone who wants to understand you may still get it wrong, but over time you should see some willingness to check their assumptions. You shouldn’t need to deliver the same explanation indefinitely.

There may also be people with whom you already feel less pressure to monitor yourself. Think about what they do that helps. Perhaps they take your questions at face value, or tell you plainly when something bothers them. That can give you a clearer sense of what to ask for in other relationships.

Wrap Up

It takes practice to leave a conversation alone when you’re used to reviewing everything you said. You may still feel the urge to send another explanation, even with people who have given you no reason to worry.

You can take that slowly. Start with someone who has shown they’ll ask when they’re unsure, and give them a chance to follow through. Being understood becomes a little less exhausting when you can trust the other person to participate.

Do you find yourself explaining more than you wanted to because you’re afraid of being misunderstood?

When a hug doesn’t feel comforting: Neurodivergence, touch, and consent

Essy Knopf neurodivergent touch sensitivity
Reading time: 3 minutes

Someone leans in and asks, “Can I give you a hug?” It’s meant to be comforting, maybe even healing.

But instead of warmth, your nervous system responds with alarm.

Do I have to? Will I seem rude if I say no? What if they think I don’t care about them?

For many autistic and ADHD people, seemingly simple gestures like hugs, handshakes, and pats on the back come with sensory discomfort, social expectations, and a lifetime of pressure to respond the “right” way.

When Touch Comes With an Invisible Social Script

Hugs and handshakes carry meaning.

A hug might communicate affection, reassurance, or connection. A handshake might signal politeness or respect.

Because these gestures are so normalized, declining them can feel surprisingly difficult.

You may not actually want the hug—but you also don’t want to hurt someone’s feelings. Which is why you might want to say yes.

You tense your body, endure the contact, smile afterward, and hope nobody notices how uncomfortable you were.

For some neurodivergent people, this becomes another form of masking: suppressing your natural response so other people remain comfortable.

Touch Can Feel Very Different in a Neurodivergent Body

Sensory experiences vary enormously from person to person.

A hug that feels soothing to someone else might feel irritating, invasive, or overwhelming to you. A handshake introduces all kinds of unpredictable and uncomfortable sensations, such as pressure or moisture.

Even an unexpected pat on the shoulder can leave some people feeling unsettled long after the other person has forgotten it happened.

At the same time, being touch-sensitive doesn’t necessarily mean disliking all touch.

You might dislike light touch but enjoy firm pressure. You might love hugs from someone you trust but dislike being hugged unexpectedly. Or you might enjoy touch one day and find the exact same gesture unbearable when you’re already overstimulated.

The important distinction is choice.

Touch tends to feel very different when you want it, expect it, and have some control over how it happens.

The Cost of Always Saying Yes

Many neurodivergent people learn early that their boundaries will not always be understood.

We hear messages like: “It’s only a hug.” “Don’t be so sensitive.” “They’re just trying to be nice.”

Eventually, those messages can become internal ones. You may start telling yourself that refusing physical affection makes you difficult, cold, or ungrateful.

So instead of asking, What does my body actually want? you ask, What response will make everyone else comfortable?

Repeatedly overriding yourself can make it harder to recognize your own preferences at all.

That’s one of the hidden costs of masking: you can become so practiced at performing comfort that you lose touch with whether you actually feel comfortable.

Try Modulating Instead of Masking

There is another option. I call it modulating.

Masking means suppressing yourself to meet someone else’s expectations. Modulating means finding a way to participate in connection while still respecting your own needs.

Instead of enduring a hug you don’t want, you might say: “I’m not much of a hug person, but I’m really happy to see you.”

You might offer a fist bump instead of a handshake. You might prefer a side hug. Or, with someone you trust, you might explain that firm pressure feels much better than a light embrace.

Modulation gives you permission to move away from an all-or-nothing choice between complete compliance and complete withdrawal.

You can still connect. You just get to have some say in how that connection happens.

Essy Knopf neurodivergent touch sensitivity

Consent Means the Answer Can Be No

Asking “Would you like a hug?” is only meaningful if saying no is genuinely acceptable.

Consent isn’t just about asking the question. It’s about respecting the answer without sulking, demanding an explanation, or treating someone’s boundary as rejection.

“No thanks.” “Not today.” “I’d rather fist bump.” Those should all be complete answers.

For neurodivergent people, creating this kind of consent culture can make relationships feel far safer.

It communicates something important: You don’t have to override your nervous system to prove that you care about me.

And that can create much more genuine intimacy than automatically performing a social ritual ever could.

Wrap Up

There is nothing inherently more loving about a hug than a wave, fist bump, smile, or heartfelt conversation.

The most meaningful form of connection is one both people can actually participate in comfortably.

Learning to identify your neurodivergent touch sensitivity—and communicate what does and doesn’t work for you—can take practice, especially after years of automatically putting other people’s comfort first.

But the people who care about you may appreciate being shown how to connect with you in a way that actually feels good.

What kind of touch feels comfortable to you—and which social gestures do you wish you felt more able to decline?

Finding connection when you’re neurodivergent

Essy Knopf neurodivergent belonging
Reading time: 3 minutes

Before attending the event, you prepare a few questions in advance.

Once you’re there, you remind yourself not to interrupt, talk too much, or get carried away discussing something that interests you.

Even with all that preparation, the interaction may still feel strained.

Perhaps the other person becomes distracted or gives shorter responses. Maybe they change the subject abruptly or seem eager to end the conversation.

Afterward, it can be difficult not to wonder what went wrong.

When rejection turns into self-criticism

Repeated social difficulties can leave a lasting impression.

You may begin thinking: I talked too much. I was too intense. They must’ve thought I was strange.

These conclusions can feel convincing, particularly when they echo messages you have received over many years. Being corrected, excluded, misunderstood, or treated as socially inappropriate can gradually shape the way you as a neurodivergent person interpret later interactions.

This can also lead to you repeatedly replaying conversations. You might find yourself perseverating over others’ facial expressions, pauses, changes in tone, or particular words and trying to determine what they meant.

Although this may feel like an attempt to learn from the experience, it can easily become exhausting self-monitoring rather than useful reflection.

Social difficulties do not happen in isolation

Neurodivergent people may be quick to assume that a difficult interaction reflects something they did wrong. But social communication is shaped by both people.

Your direct question may be interpreted as confrontational. Your enthusiasm may be read as being overly intense. A neurodivergent person’s indirect communication may be difficult to follow. Two people may also simply have different expectations around humor, openness, pacing, or emotional expression.

The double empathy problem offers one way of understanding this. Misunderstanding between neurodivergents and neurotypicals can be mutual rather than the result of a deficit on one side.

Not every unsuccessful interaction needs to be treated as a mistake that must be identified and corrected.

Sometimes the issue is simply a poor interpersonal fit.

Essy Knopf neurodivergent belonging

Masking can complicate belonging

For people who have experienced frequent rejection, masking may become a form of protection.

As neurodivergents, we often learn to speak less, suppress stimming, avoid discussing your interests, or carefully monitor how we are coming across to avoid being socially punished.

These strategies can certainly reduce social risk, but they can also make genuine connection more difficult, because other people are interacting with a highly managed version of you.

Not that one should abandon caution or disclosing everything immediately. What I’m suggesting is that it might be possible to allow more room, gradually and selectively, for your natural communication style, interests, and preferences to be visible.

Neurodivergent belonging can prove even more difficult to build when acceptance depends entirely on concealment.

Pay attention to compatibility

It can be useful to shift attention away from whether you successfully impressed someone and toward what the interaction was actually like for you.

Were you able to speak without monitoring every sentence? Did the other person show genuine interest? Could a misunderstanding be clarified without becoming a major rupture? Did you feel respected, even when your communication styles differed?

These questions offer information about compatibility rather than social performance.

You don’t need to be equally comfortable with everyone to belong. What is needed, rather, is relationships in which difference can exist without becoming a constant source of tension or judgment.

Wrap Up

After years of difficult social experiences, an awkward interaction can easily feel like confirmation of an old belief about yourself.

It may be more useful to consider a wider range of explanations, such as anxiety, incompatible communication styles, misunderstanding, the social setting, or simply a lack of mutual connection.

Finding meaningful relationships is not only a matter of improving social skill; it also involves finding people with whom understanding, respect, and reciprocity are possible.

Why avoidant attachment can feel so intense for neurodivergent people

Essy Knopf avoidant attachment
Reading time: 3 minutes

You meet someone, and the connection feels easy.

They’re warm, curious, emotionally open, and accepting of your neurodivergence. For once, you don’t feel like you’re “too much.”

Then something changes.

The good-morning texts disappear. Replies become shorter and plans turn vague. The warmth you felt at the beginning seems to cool.

Nothing dramatic has happened, but you notice.

And suddenly your brain starts asking: Did I overshare? Was I too intense? Did I do something wrong?

For neurodivergent people with anxious attachment, this kind of uncertainty can be deeply activating.

When your brain goes into fix-it mode

Many autistic and ADHD people are highly sensitive to changes in patterns, including tone, communication, and emotional availability.

If you’ve also experienced rejection, exclusion, or relationships where someone slowly disappeared, subtle distancing may feel like a warning sign.

So you try to fix things.

You delay your replies so you don’t seem too eager, share less, and ask for less. You become more agreeable.

Slowly, the focus shifts from: “Is this relationship working for me?” to: “How do I stop this person from leaving?”

That’s where anxious attachment can lead you toward self-abandonment.

Signs of an anxious–avoidant dynamic

Avoidant attachment doesn’t always look like someone obviously running away from intimacy.

Sometimes it looks like inconsistency.

They may be very engaged one day and emotionally distant the next. When you ask what changed, they tell you that you’re overthinking.

You try to address a problem, and they shut down or say they “don’t want to fight.”

You share something vulnerable, and they change the subject, intellectualize your feelings, or offer a response that sounds empathetic without actually feeling emotionally present.

As a result, you may begin doubting your own perceptions.

You can notice a pattern without blaming yourself

Anxiety can sometimes cause us to interpret uncertainty negatively. But that doesn’t mean every concern is imagined.

The key is separating observation from interpretation.

For example: “They’ve initiated fewer conversations this week” is an observation.

“They’re losing interest because I ruined everything” is an interpretation.

You can take what you’re noticing seriously without automatically deciding it means there is something wrong with you.

Essy Knopf avoidant attachmment

Fast intimacy isn’t always secure intimacy

Another confusing pattern can be intense closeness early in dating.

Someone might tell you: “I’ve never connected with anyone like this.” “You understand me better than anyone.”

For neurodivergent people who have spent years feeling misunderstood, that kind of recognition can be incredibly powerful.

But intensity isn’t the same thing as safety.

Emotional security develops through consistency, honesty, repair, and the willingness to stay present when things become uncomfortable.

Stop trying to earn emotional availability

Anxious attachment, in the absence of reflection, can turn dating into an audition.

You may try to become less sensitive, or eager, or demanding, or visibly neurodivergent.

And yet, emotional safety shouldn’t require you to continually shrink yourself.

Healthy relationships still involve misunderstandings, frustration, and occasional distance. The difference is that both people are willing to communicate, reconnect, and repair.

So when you notice yourself obsessing over how to keep someone interested, try asking a different question: Do I feel emotionally safe, valued, and able to be myself with this person?

That question may tell you far more than analyzing another text message ever will.

Wrap Up

If you have anxious attachment, someone pulling away can trigger much more than disappointment. It can also activate old experiences of rejection and leave you scrambling to figure out what you did wrong.

But someone else’s emotional distance is not automatically evidence that you need to change yourself.

Pay attention to patterns. Pay attention to how the relationship makes you feel. And remember that your needs matter too.

Have you ever found yourself becoming smaller or less authentic when someone started pulling away?

Reclaiming yourself through neurodivergent shame resilience

Essy Knopf shame resilience
Reading time: 5 minutes

Have you spent most of your life being told, directly or indirectly, that you need to tone yourself down?

Maybe you learned to explain yourself before anyone asked, apologize before anyone complained, or keep certain needs to yourself because experience taught you that expressing them would create tension.

You might have become very good at reading the room because you were always trying to work out whether someone was irritated with you.

For a lot of autistic and ADHD people, shame starts there.

It starts with being corrected often enough that you begin correcting yourself. Someone tells you that you are too ___ (insert pejorative here: sensitive, too intense, too blunt, too distracted, too much, etc.).

A teacher might decide you are lazy when you cannot get started on an assignment. A parent becomes frustrated by a sensory issue you cannot simply switch off. Other kids notice that you talk differently, move differently, or care deeply about things they do not understand, and also make sure you know they have noticed.

At some point, those reactions stop feeling like other people’s interpretations of you and start feeling like the truth.

That is where shame becomes difficult to untangle.

When shame starts sounding like your own voice

Internalized ableism rarely announces itself as such.

It sounds more like, Why can’t I just handle this? Or, I should know better by now. Or, I always make things awkward.

Sometimes it shows up before anything has even happened. You sense that somebody might be annoyed, so you start explaining. You think you may have spoken too much, so you replay the conversation afterward. Someone’s tone changes slightly and your mind immediately starts searching for what you did wrong.

After years of this, it can become hard to tell where reasonable self-reflection ends and self-surveillance begins.

There is a difference between realizing you made a mistake and deciding that the mistake says something terrible about who you are. Or between recognizing that something is difficult for you and treating that difficulty as proof of personal failure.

Yet, for autistic and ADHD people, those distinctions can get blurred very early.

If your executive functioning problems were consistently treated as carelessness, eventually you may come to believe you are careless. If your sensory needs were treated as fussiness, you may feel embarrassed by them. If people repeatedly interpreted your directness as hostility, you may second-guess yourself every time you speak plainly.

This can leave many of us with a legacy of inadequacy and shame.

Shame resilience does not mean becoming fearless

The idea of shame resilience is useful because it does not require us to somehow stop feeling shame.

That would be a strange goal anyway, since shame is a powerful social emotion, and most of us are going to experience it from time to time.

The more useful question is what happens after it appears. Do you immediately believe what it is telling you? Do you retreat, attack yourself, or change your behavior before you have even decided whether you have actually done something wrong?

Or can you stay with the discomfort long enough to become curious about it?

One question I find especially useful is: Where did I learn this? Not, Why am I like this? Or What is wrong with me?

Instead, we can ask ourselves: Where did I learn that needing more time makes me difficult? Where did I learn that asking for clarification makes me stupid? Where did I learn that resting before I am completely exhausted is lazy?

Recognizing that a belief has a history can make it feel a little less like an unquestionable fact.

Authenticity can feel wrong before it feels right

There is a lot of talk about “being your authentic self,” but that phrase can become almost meaningless when you have spent years trying to work out which version of yourself other people will tolerate.

For someone who has masked heavily, authenticity may not feel freeing at first. Embarrassment may even result.

For example, you might decide to tell someone that a restaurant is too loud for you rather than forcing yourself through dinner, and then spend the next hour wondering whether you were difficult.

Or you may ask for instructions to be written down instead of pretending you will remember them, only to feel self-conscious about needing that support in the first place.

Even letting yourself stim more openly, asking someone what they meant rather than guessing, or admitting that you are overwhelmed can bring up a surprising amount of discomfort.

That makes sense when hiding those things once helped you avoid criticism.

Being more authentic does not require that we abandon self-awareness or decide that our impact on other people no longer matters. But it is an invitation to no longer assume, as a starting point, that your needs and differences are the problem.

Sometimes the shame really is coming from outside

One thing I think gets lost in conversations about shame is that we often talk about it as though it exists entirely inside the individual. It does not.

Shame is social. People use it, sometimes deliberately and sometimes without much thought, to enforce what they consider normal.

Familiar examples are a child who moves too much being told to sit properly. Someone who communicates directly is criticized for their tone. Or an employee asks for an accommodation and suddenly senses that they are being seen as inconvenient.

No one has to say, “There is something wrong with you,” because they’ve communicated that message quite effectively in other ways.

Body language is sometimes all that is necessary. A pause. A look. An eye roll. Communication may also involve a joke made at your expense, or a sudden coolness that enters a conversation after you have said something in a way that was not expected.

If you have spent years noticing those reactions, it is no wonder that you become cautious.

This is why shame resilience cannot simply mean teaching yourself that everybody accepts you and that all of your fears are irrational. Sometimes people really are judgmental. Sometimes environments really are ableist.

The work is learning not to let every negative reaction automatically become evidence against yourself.

Learning not to turn every mistake into a verdict

There is another side to this, because being neuroaffirming does not mean pretending we never get things wrong. We do.

Sometimes we misunderstand someone. Sometimes we interrupt, forget something important, communicate poorly, get defensive, or hurt another person without intending to.

The problem starts when a fairly ordinary mistake becomes connected to something much bigger. We jump from I did something wrong to there is something wrong with me is shame.

For people who have lived with years of criticism around their neurodivergence, this jump can happen very quickly.

Shame resilience involves trying to stay with what actually happened. Sure—maybe you need to apologize or do things differently next time.

None of that however requires turning against yourself.

Rebuilding self-trust

A lot of this work comes back to trust.

When you have spent years checking your reactions against everyone else’s, it can be surprisingly difficult to believe your own experience.

Was that room really too loud, or am I being dramatic? Do I actually need a break, or am I being lazy? Was that comment unfair, or am I just too sensitive?

Sometimes we become so used to putting our own perceptions on trial that we barely notice we are doing it.

Rebuilding self-trust begins when we learn to validate our perceptions.

For instance, you might notice that you are overwhelmed and respond before you reach breaking point. You might tell somebody that you did not understand instead of pretending you did. You try asking for what you need and resist the urge to bury the request under three paragraphs of apology.

Then perhaps, after doing this enough times, you realize that having needs did not make you unreasonable after all.

Wrap Up

Shame can become so familiar that we mistake it for self-knowledge.

For autistic and ADHD folks who spent years without understanding their neurodivergence, some of the harshest beliefs we hold about ourselves may have begun as other people’s reactions to traits they did not understand.

Shame resilience is about becoming a little less willing to accept shame’s version of events without question.

And sometimes that begins with a very small interruption to an old thought: Hang on. Is this actually what I believe about myself, or is this something I learned to believe?

What is one thing you used to feel ashamed of that you now understand differently because you know you are autistic or ADHD?

Neurodivergent isolation: When being alone isn’t a choice

Essy Knopf neurodivergent isolation
Reading time: 4 minutes

For many autistic and ADHD people, loneliness develops slowly.

It can begin with being corrected for speaking too honestly, mocked for stimming, excluded from a group, or criticized for missing an unwritten social rule. When these experiences happen repeatedly, they can change the way we approach other people.

We learn to expect rejection before it arrives.

We might hesitate before sending a message, or decline invitations because we assume we will feel awkward or overwhelmed. We stop sharing the parts of ourselves that have been misunderstood.

We may tell ourselves, “I just prefer being alone.” And perhaps we do.

Many neurodivergent people genuinely enjoy solitude. Being alone can mean freedom from masking, social pressure, sensory overload, and the exhausting task of monitoring how other people are reacting to us.

But it is still worth asking: Is this solitude restoring me, or is it shrinking my world?

When Isolation Becomes Protection

Neurodivergent isolation is often both a lifestyle preference and an adaptation.

When connection has repeatedly led to embarrassment, correction, punishment, or rejection, the nervous system learns that distance is safer. Avoiding people becomes a way of preventing future pain.

But beneath the withdrawal, there may still be a wish for connection.

You may want someone to ask how your day was; who understands your communication style, respects your sensory needs, and does not require you to perform a more socially acceptable version of yourself.

Why Connection Can Feel So Risky

What might stop you from seeking such a connection is being told across your lifetime that your natural way of being is wrong.

Perhaps you were described as too sensitive, too intense, too quiet, too blunt, or too emotional. Maybe you were punished for behavior you did not realize was considered inappropriate. You may have been left out without explanation or told to “try harder” socially without receiving any useful guidance.

These experiences can create a heightened sensitivity to rejection.

You may interpret a friend replying briefly as proof that they are angry, or a delayed text as evidence that the relationship is ending.

In such cases, your nervous system is trying to protect you by spotting danger early.

The difficulty is that it may begin to react to all neutral situations as though rejection has already happened.

This can make relationships feel like constant work. Instead of simply being present, you may find yourself analyzing tone, facial expressions, pauses, punctuation, and every word you said afterward.

Even positive interactions can become exhausting.

The Hidden Appeal of Solitude

When you are alone, there is much less to decode.

You can stim without wondering whether someone finds it strange, or spend time with your interests without worrying that you are talking too much or neglecting others. You can choose your lighting, sound level, clothing, food, and routine.

Solitude can be deeply regulating.

For this reason, the goal should never be to pressure neurodivergent people into becoming more social. More social contact is not automatically better, especially when that contact requires masking or exposes someone to continued mistreatment.

The real question is whether one’s current level of solitude is chosen freely.

Healthy solitude usually leaves you feeling calmer, clearer, or more energized. Protective isolation can initially feel peaceful, but may also leave you feeling disconnected or resigned.

Many of us end up telling ourselves that we don’t need anyone, while secretly grieving the absence of meaningful relationships.

When Boundaries Hide Grief

After enough painful social experiences, protective beliefs can sound like healthy boundaries: “People are too exhausting.” “No one ever understands me.” “I’m better off on my own.” “Trying always ends badly.”

Sometimes these statements are partly true. There may be people you are genuinely better off avoiding. Certain environments may be inaccessible or unsafe. Some relationships may demand far more than they give.

But it is also possible for a boundary to become so broad that it blocks every opportunity for connection.

The belief that all closeness is dangerous may protect you from rejection, but it also protects you from being known.

This is how isolation can become self-reinforcing. The less you interact with others, the fewer chances you have to experience safe connection. Without those corrective experiences, the belief that relationships always end badly remains unchallenged.

Returning to Connection Gently

Healing from neurodivergent isolation does not mean forcing yourself into crowded events, maintaining dozens of friendships, or pushing through social exhaustion.

It can begin much more gently. For example, replying to one message you have been avoiding, or sharing an honest thought with someone who has previously treated you with kindness.

Another option includes spending time in a neurodivergent-friendly group where direct communication and sensory needs are respected.

It can also help to identify what makes connection feel safer.

Perhaps you prefer communicating by text rather than phone, or meeting one person at a time. You may need plans to be made in advance, a clear end time, or permission to leave when you become overwhelmed.

These needs do not make you demanding, but help create the conditions in which genuine connection becomes possible, while leaving enough room for your full neurodivergent self.

Essy Knopf neurodivergent isolation

Learning to Trust Slowly

In opening ourselves to the right people, we must also remember that safe people are not perfect. Miscommunications are inevitable in every relationship, especially across different neurotypes.

What makes someone safe isn’t that they never misunderstand us, but that they’re willing to approach those misunderstandings with curiosity and compassion, as well as a desire to repair.

In such instances, ask yourself: Can the other person listen? Can they clarify rather than accuse? Can both of you acknowledge your part without turning the interaction into a verdict on your worth?

These experiences can gradually teach the nervous system that connection is not always dangerous.

Wrap Up

Neurodivergent isolation makes sense when you have spent years feeling misunderstood, corrected, or rejected.

Withdrawal may have helped you survive environments in which being your authentic self did not feel safe. There is no shame in having developed strategies that protected you.

But those strategies do not always have to remain permanent. You can honor your need for solitude while still remaining open to connection.

Have you ever realized that your preference for being alone was partly a form of protection? What helps connection feel safer for you?