Why do I always have to explain myself? Autism, ADHD, and being misunderstood

Essy Knopf neurodivergent overexplaining
Reading time: 4 minutes

Have you ever left a conversation feeling fine, then started wondering whether something you said sounded rude?

By the time you get home, you’re considering sending a message to explain yourself. You don’t actually know whether the other person was offended. And yet leaving it alone feels risky.

For many autistic and ADHD adults, being misunderstood is familiar enough that we start preparing for it before it happens.

For example, we may qualify a question so it doesn’t sound like criticism. Or we may explain why we need time alone, then reassure the person that we enjoyed seeing them. Sometimes the explanation gets longer than whatever we originally wanted to say.

It can be hard to enjoy their company when we’re also reviewing our own performance.

When you start questioning your own intentions

There’s a difference between knowing you’re interested and knowing how to make that interest recognizable to someone else in a social interaction.

You might look away because it helps you listen, then remember that someone once accused you of ignoring them for doing exactly that. So you make yourself look back, even though you’re now finding it harder to follow the conversation.

Your attention shifts from what works for you to what will reassure them.

American sociologist and writer W. E. B. Du Bois explored a particular form of divided self-awareness through his concept of double consciousness: the experience of being Black in a racist society and seeing oneself through the judgments of the dominant white culture.

Although rooted in a distinct experience of racism, his account offers a useful way to think about neurodivergent masking: how we can become so accustomed to seeing ourselves through other people’s judgments that we begin to distrust our own understanding of ourselves.

You know you asked a sincere question, but someone heard a challenge. Now you’re wondering whether you were being difficult without realizing it.

When this happens repeatedly, knowing what you meant can stop feeling like enough. You start anticipating how you’ll be interpreted and adjusting yourself before you’ve even spoken.

How you end up doing the repair work

If your questions were treated as backtalk growing up, it makes sense that you might explain why you’re asking. If people regularly mistook your expression for anger, you may have learned to smile when you didn’t feel like smiling.

Those adjustments may have helped. They may still help. The difficulty is that you can become accustomed to making them whether or not the person in front of you needs them.

A friend gets quiet, and you start searching for what you did wrong. Perhaps they’re tired. Perhaps something you said did bother them. You don’t yet know, but you’re already working on an apology.

This is where I think we need to ask more of the people around us.

Autistic researcher Damian Milton’s double empathy problem describes how autistic and non-autistic people can struggle to understand each other across differences in experience and perspective.

It challenges the assumption that a misunderstanding must originate with the autistic person. The framework was developed around autism, though the question of shared effort may also resonate with ADHD readers.

Consider what happens when someone assumes your directness means you’re annoyed. You can explain what you meant, but they also need to be willing to reconsider their interpretation. If they continue treating their first impression as more reliable than your explanation, there’s a limit to what further explaining can accomplish.

Of course, we can hurt people without intending to. And we still need to listen when someone tells us that happened. But there should be room in that conversation for them to listen to us, too.

The conversation ends, but you’re still in it

Sometimes the most tiring part comes after social interactions. You’re making dinner and remembering a pause before someone answered you. You wonder whether you interrupted them. You pick up your phone, reread the message you’ve drafted, and decide it sounds excessive.

Then you wonder whether saying nothing would be worse.

Overexplaining can become a way of trying to settle that uncertainty. If you provide enough context, perhaps you can prevent someone from coming away with an impression of you that feels painfully wrong.

But you can’t always explain your way into feeling certain about what another person thinks. And the more time you spend trying, the less attention you may have for your own experience of the interaction.

Did you enjoy yourself? Were you comfortable? Did they make an effort to understand you?

These are questions that deserve some consideration before you spend hours deciding how to make yourself easier for others.

Letting someone else do their part

I don’t think “just stop caring what people think” is particularly helpful advice here. Other people’s judgments can affect our relationships and our jobs. Some of us have good reasons to be careful.

A more manageable starting point is to notice when you’re responding to something that happened and when you’re responding to something you fear happened. Another person’s short reply might make you uneasy, but it doesn’t tell you much by itself.

With someone you trust, you could ask, “Did that come across differently from how I intended?” That gives them a chance to tell you, rather than leaving you to construct both sides of the conversation.

You can also ask for an adjustment that would make future conversations easier: “Sometimes my voice sounds flat when I’m concentrating. If you think I’m upset, please ask.”

Then notice what they do with that information. Someone who wants to understand you may still get it wrong, but over time you should see some willingness to check their assumptions. You shouldn’t need to deliver the same explanation indefinitely.

There may also be people with whom you already feel less pressure to monitor yourself. Think about what they do that helps. Perhaps they take your questions at face value, or tell you plainly when something bothers them. That can give you a clearer sense of what to ask for in other relationships.

Wrap Up

It takes practice to leave a conversation alone when you’re used to reviewing everything you said. You may still feel the urge to send another explanation, even with people who have given you no reason to worry.

You can take that slowly. Start with someone who has shown they’ll ask when they’re unsure, and give them a chance to follow through. Being understood becomes a little less exhausting when you can trust the other person to participate.

Do you find yourself explaining more than you wanted to because you’re afraid of being misunderstood?

Finding connection when you’re neurodivergent

Essy Knopf neurodivergent belonging
Reading time: 3 minutes

Before attending the event, you prepare a few questions in advance.

Once you’re there, you remind yourself not to interrupt, talk too much, or get carried away discussing something that interests you.

Even with all that preparation, the interaction may still feel strained.

Perhaps the other person becomes distracted or gives shorter responses. Maybe they change the subject abruptly or seem eager to end the conversation.

Afterward, it can be difficult not to wonder what went wrong.

When rejection turns into self-criticism

Repeated social difficulties can leave a lasting impression.

You may begin thinking: I talked too much. I was too intense. They must’ve thought I was strange.

These conclusions can feel convincing, particularly when they echo messages you have received over many years. Being corrected, excluded, misunderstood, or treated as socially inappropriate can gradually shape the way you as a neurodivergent person interpret later interactions.

This can also lead to you repeatedly replaying conversations. You might find yourself perseverating over others’ facial expressions, pauses, changes in tone, or particular words and trying to determine what they meant.

Although this may feel like an attempt to learn from the experience, it can easily become exhausting self-monitoring rather than useful reflection.

Social difficulties do not happen in isolation

Neurodivergent people may be quick to assume that a difficult interaction reflects something they did wrong. But social communication is shaped by both people.

Your direct question may be interpreted as confrontational. Your enthusiasm may be read as being overly intense. A neurodivergent person’s indirect communication may be difficult to follow. Two people may also simply have different expectations around humor, openness, pacing, or emotional expression.

The double empathy problem offers one way of understanding this. Misunderstanding between neurodivergents and neurotypicals can be mutual rather than the result of a deficit on one side.

Not every unsuccessful interaction needs to be treated as a mistake that must be identified and corrected.

Sometimes the issue is simply a poor interpersonal fit.

Essy Knopf neurodivergent belonging

Masking can complicate belonging

For people who have experienced frequent rejection, masking may become a form of protection.

As neurodivergents, we often learn to speak less, suppress stimming, avoid discussing your interests, or carefully monitor how we are coming across to avoid being socially punished.

These strategies can certainly reduce social risk, but they can also make genuine connection more difficult, because other people are interacting with a highly managed version of you.

Not that one should abandon caution or disclosing everything immediately. What I’m suggesting is that it might be possible to allow more room, gradually and selectively, for your natural communication style, interests, and preferences to be visible.

Neurodivergent belonging can prove even more difficult to build when acceptance depends entirely on concealment.

Pay attention to compatibility

It can be useful to shift attention away from whether you successfully impressed someone and toward what the interaction was actually like for you.

Were you able to speak without monitoring every sentence? Did the other person show genuine interest? Could a misunderstanding be clarified without becoming a major rupture? Did you feel respected, even when your communication styles differed?

These questions offer information about compatibility rather than social performance.

You don’t need to be equally comfortable with everyone to belong. What is needed, rather, is relationships in which difference can exist without becoming a constant source of tension or judgment.

Wrap Up

After years of difficult social experiences, an awkward interaction can easily feel like confirmation of an old belief about yourself.

It may be more useful to consider a wider range of explanations, such as anxiety, incompatible communication styles, misunderstanding, the social setting, or simply a lack of mutual connection.

Finding meaningful relationships is not only a matter of improving social skill; it also involves finding people with whom understanding, respect, and reciprocity are possible.