Misophonia and the sounds we can’t mute

Essy Knopf misophonia
Reading time: 2 minutes

Someone beside you is chewing, and suddenly it’s all you can hear. You can’t follow the conversation, because each mouth sound makes you more tense. Nobody else seems bothered, which makes it awkward to explain why you need to move away.

For people with misophonia, everyday “human” sounds like these can make sharing a meal difficult. Online, those same noises are sometimes amplified for an audience that finds them relaxing.

Mukbang videos, which feature people eating on camera, bring that contrast into focus. Some viewers enjoy the chewing and lip-smacking. Others reach for the mute button.

I find myself caught between wanting to watch and wanting to switch them off.

When a sound provokes more than annoyance

Misophonia involves a decreased tolerance for particular sounds or associated cues, which can bring on intense emotional and physical reactions. Eating sounds are common triggers, though the sounds that affect one person may not bother another. The reaction is tied to the specific sound or its meaning, rather than simply how loud it is.

For me, the response can feel like rage. I hear the noise and feel an immediate urge to get away from it.

Chewing and slurping are difficult, but other human sounds can catch me off guard too. Repeated sniffing, for example, or the little noises someone makes to show they’re listening. I can’t always predict what will bother me until it happens.

That can make social situations uncomfortable in ways other people don’t necessarily see. They’re carrying on with a conversation while I’m trying to manage my reaction to a sound they may barely notice.

Essy Knopf misophonia

A shared meal is harder to mute

The strange part is that I find the visual side of these videos genuinely appealing.

I love chewy textures. Mochi and gummies have a physical quality I enjoy, and watching someone bite into them brings that sensation to mind.

Online, I can switch off the sound. At a dinner table, it’s more complicated.

When I briefly lived in China, slurping was common in the dining settings I encountered. I found it difficult enough that I sometimes wanted to eat alone. The people around me were eating in a way that was ordinary for them, while I was becoming overwhelmed.

That distinction matters. My response to a sound doesn’t automatically mean the person making it is being inconsiderate. Equally, knowing they aren’t doing anything wrong doesn’t make the sound easier to tolerate.

It helps to explain what’s happening without making someone’s eating habits the entire problem: “Certain mouth sounds are really difficult for me. Could we put some music on?” Depending on the setting, sitting farther away or taking a short break might also make the meal more manageable.

Those adjustments won’t work for everyone. The point is to make a shared meal more comfortable without turning it into an argument about whether a sound should bother you.

Wrap Up

For now, the mute button lets me enjoy the mochi without the chewing. In person, I have to be more deliberate about what I need and how I communicate it.

I can want someone’s company and still struggle with the sound of them eating. Recognizing both makes it easier to explain why I might need an adjustment or a break.

Do you experience misophonia? How do you cope with it?

The neurodivergent manifesto: For anyone who learned to hide themselves

Essy Knopf neurodivergent manifesto
Reading time: < 1 minute

Over the years, I’ve worked with a lot of neurodivergent people carrying the same fear: that their struggles meant something was fundamentally wrong with them.

They spent years being treated like their differences were problems to fix, hide, overcome, or apologize for.

People pushing themselves to exhaustion trying to seem “normal.”

People becoming experts at looking “fine.”

People hiding overwhelm, confusion, sensory pain, emotional intensity, or support needs because they were afraid of how others would react.

After enough conversations like these, I started writing something that eventually became The Neurodivergent Manifesto.

Part of it reads:

“We are not failed neurotypical people.”

“A person can struggle and still deserve dignity.”

“We deserve lives that do not require self-erasure.”

A lot of neurodivergent people learn early that authenticity comes with consequences.

As a result, they adapt.

They monitor themselves constantly. Rehearse conversations. Hide stress. Push through overload. Suppress needs. Become whoever other people seem most comfortable with.

Essy Knopf neurodivergent manifesto

And after doing that long enough, many end up carrying a deep sense of shame without fully realizing where it came from.

The problem was never simply being different, but rather existing in environments where difference was treated like failure.

Download the Full Neurodivergent Manifesto

What would change if you no longer treated your needs, limits, or differences as something shameful?

When accessibility isn’t actually accessible for neurodivergent folks

Essy Knopf neurodivergent accessibility
Reading time: 2 minutes

When people hear the word accessibility, they often think of ramps, elevators, wheelchair access, and accessible parking spaces. These accommodations are essential—but they’re also only part of the picture.

What often gets overlooked are the needs of people with invisible disabilities, including autistic and ADHD individuals.

You can walk into a space that appears inclusive on paper and still find yourself completely shut out of the experience.

Maybe the room acoustics are terrible, making it impossible to hear someone speaking. Maybe multiple conversations happening at once create sensory overload. Maybe fluorescent lighting feels physically painful. Maybe there’s no quiet space to decompress when things become overwhelming.

For someone with auditory processing challenges, ADHD, autism, sensory sensitivities—or a combination of these—these barriers can make participation exhausting.

I recently found myself in a community setting that was technically accessible. It had clear accommodations for physical disabilities, which was genuinely great to see.

But every time someone spoke into a microphone, they stood too far away for their voice to be heard clearly. Instead of hearing words, I heard muffled echoes and background noise.

Then came the social portion of the event, which was crowded, loud, and acoustically chaotic.

I wanted connection. I wanted community.

Essy Knopf
Pexels/Ekaterina Belinskaya

Instead, I found myself overwhelmed and frustrated.

And this is where many institutions miss the mark: accessibility often focuses on what can be easily seen while ignoring what can’t.

True accessibility should also include:

  • Clear microphone usage
  • Captioning whenever possible
  • Sensory-friendly spaces
  • Quiet rooms or low-stimulation areas
  • Flexible participation options
  • Awareness of auditory processing challenges
  • Recognition that not all disabilities are visible

Inclusion shouldn’t stop at physical access.

If someone can enter your space but can’t meaningfully participate once they’re there, that space still isn’t fully accessible.

And that’s a conversation we need to be having more often.

Accessibility should evolve alongside our understanding of disability.

Invisible disabilities deserve visibility too.

Have you ever been in a space that claimed to be accessible but still excluded your needs?