The trauma beneath neurodivergent moral perfectionism

Essy Knopf moral perfectionism
Reading time: 5 minutes

If you’ve ever felt like you had to be flawless just to be okay—like one slip-up might unravel your relationships, reputation, or even your sense of self—you’re not imagining things. For many neurodivergent folks, perfection is a question of safety.

This pressure to be “good” or “right” all the time is a trauma response; one that often stems from being judged, corrected, or punished for simply being different. This is the root of what we call moral perfectionism.

And here’s the thing: it makes sense. If your lived experience has taught you that being misunderstood can lead to shame, rejection, or even danger, of course you’ll try to control the narrative.

How Moral Perfectionism Develops

For many autistics and ADHDers, moral perfectionism is a slow build, shaped by years of subtle and not-so-subtle messages that being ourselves isn’t acceptable.

Think back to childhood. Maybe you were the kid who blurted out answers, who asked too many questions, who got fixated on fairness or honesty. And maybe the response from adults and peers wasn’t understanding, but annoyance, discipline, or dismissal.

Even when we weren’t explicitly punished, we were often corrected in ways that left deep impressions. A teacher might’ve snapped at you for interrupting when your ADHD brain just moved faster than the class. A friend might’ve gone quiet after you said something blunt, and no one ever explained why it upset them. These moments send a message: You’re not doing this right. Be careful. Don’t stand out.

So we start building rules in our heads. If I just follow this invisible script—if I’m polite, agreeable, emotionally controlled—maybe I won’t get hurt again. This is our attempt to construct a fragile kind of social safety net where the cost of error feels unbearably high.

That’s moral perfectionism: the desperate attempt to avoid harm by being unassailably “good.” It’s armor. But armor is heavy. And over time, it starts to suffocate the very person it was meant to protect.

The All-or-Nothing Trap

One of the most exhausting parts of moral perfectionism is the mental rigidity it breeds—what therapists often call black-and-white thinking or all-or-nothing thinking. It’s the belief that things are either right or wrong, safe or unsafe, good or bad, with no in-between.

This kind of thinking happens because ambiguity feels threatening. If you’ve spent your life trying to dodge social landmines, trying to avoid being shamed for things you didn’t even realize were “wrong,” then certainty becomes a lifeline. It’s easier to think in absolutes when the grey areas have historically been where you got hurt.

So we simplify. We tell ourselves: “If I get this right, I’m safe. If I mess up, I’m in danger.” But here’s the catch: the world is grey. Social rules are inconsistent. What’s “okay” in one group might be “rude” in another. And when we use rigid rules to try and manage a fluid world, we’re left feeling anxious, confused, and often ashamed.

The deeper problem is that this kind of black-and-white thinking affects how we see ourselves. A single mistake becomes a moral failure. A disagreement becomes a personal rejection. Suddenly, we’re not just someone who made an error—we’re a bad person.

Moral perfectionism tells us that being anything less than perfect is unacceptable. But living in that mental space is exhausting. And it slowly strips us of the ability to tolerate being human, with all the messiness and imperfection that entails.

The Inner Critic and External Judgment

If you live with moral perfectionism, you probably know the voice I’m about to describe. The one that says, “You should have known better.” “Why did you say that?” “They’re definitely upset with you.” It’s the voice that replays every interaction on a loop, picking apart your words, your tone, your timing.

This voice is relentless, and it doesn’t care about your intentions. To it, being perfect is the bare minimum. And that inner critic? It was built from all those years of being misunderstood, corrected, or excluded for being different.

For autistics and ADHDers, that critic often takes root early, constantly screaming warnings: Don’t mess up again. Don’t draw attention to yourself. Don’t let them see who you really are. Over time, we start to believe it. We mistake it for truth.

And here’s the twist: the longer we live under the tyranny of this critic, the more likely we are to project its judgments onto others. The same rigidity we apply to ourselves—expecting flawlessness, moral clarity, unshakeable rightness—can begin to show up in how we view the world. We might struggle to forgive others’ mistakes, or feel unsafe around those who act with ambiguity or imperfection.

But again, this isn’t because we’re cruel or hyperjudgmental. It’s because we’re wounded. We’ve survived by holding ourselves to impossible standards, and it feels terrifying to lower those standards—for ourselves or anyone else.

That’s the double bind of moral perfectionism: the critic inside keeps us small, and the judgment outside keeps us isolated. Breaking that cycle begins with recognizing the critic for what it is: a scared part of you trying to protect your heart. But it’s doing so with the wrong tools.

Essy Knopf moral perfectionism

How to Start Unlearning Moral Perfectionism

If you’ve started to recognize moral perfectionism in your life, take a breath. This realization can feel heavy, but it’s also a powerful first step. Recognize that you’ve been responding exactly as anyone might when they’ve had to navigate years of judgment, rejection, and fear.

Unlearning moral perfectionism is about finding safety without needing to be flawless. Here’s how that journey can begin:

1. Name It When It’s Happening

The next time you catch yourself spiraling after a small mistake, pause. Say to yourself, “This feels like moral perfectionism.” That simple act of naming gives you space and turns a reaction into a moment of awareness. And that’s where change begins.

2. Ask: “What Else Might Be True?”

When your brain jumps to catastrophic conclusions—“They must hate me,” “I’m awful,” “This is ruined”—ask yourself: is there another way to see this? Maybe someone’s just distracted. Maybe they misunderstood. Maybe you’re tired. Not every misstep is a moral failure.

3. Recognize the Inner Critic—and Respond Kindly

When that inner voice starts up, acknowledge it: “I hear you. I know you’re trying to keep me safe.” Then add: “But I don’t need punishment. I need compassion.” Picture how you’d respond to a friend in the same situation and try offering that same grace to yourself.

4. Choose Repair Over Rejection

Mistakes happen. Ruptures are part of every relationship, whether personal or professional. When they do, practice staying. You don’t have to vanish in shame or lash out defensively. Apologize if needed, ask for clarification if you’re hurt, and keep showing up.

5. Lean Into Curiosity

Moral perfectionism thrives on certainty. But growth lives in curiosity. Ask yourself: what don’t I know here? What if there’s more to the story? Curiosity softens judgment. It opens space for connection, nuance, and learning.

6. Find People Who Welcome Your Imperfections

You deserve to be in spaces where you don’t have to earn love or acceptance with perfection. Look for people who can sit with complexity, give gentle feedback, and still choose you, especially when you’re messy or confused or unsure.

Final Thoughts

Moral perfectionism is often mistaken for high standards or personal integrity. But underneath, it’s usually something more tender; more painful. It’s the mark of someone who’s been hurt by judgment, by shame, by the endless need to explain themselves in a world that just didn’t get it.

If this post has made you think, “Oh… this is me,” know this: you are not alone. You didn’t choose to live with moral perfectionism, but you can choose to start unlearning it. It takes time and a ton of self-compassion.

You don’t have to be perfect to be good. You don’t have to be morally unimpeachable to deserve love, connection, or support. In fact, it’s in our mistakes, in our honest repair, and in our shared messiness that we often find the truest forms of human connection.

So let this be your reminder: you’re allowed to be complex. To change your mind. To speak imperfectly. You’re allowed to take up space as you are, and not as the flawless version of yourself your trauma once told you you had to be.

Have you noticed moral perfectionism showing up in your own life?

Taming the tyrannical inner critic: A guide for autistics and ADHDers

Essy Knopf tyrannical inner critic
Reading time: 3 minutes

If you’re autistic or ADHD and constantly hear a voice telling you you’re “not good enough,” you’re not imagining it—and you’re definitely not alone.

That voice? It’s your tyrannical inner critic (TIC). And for many neurodivergent (ND) folks, it’s an all-too-familiar presence.

The TIC is the voice that says: “You’re going to mess this up.” “Why even try? You always fail.” “People don’t like you. You’re too much.”

It never rests. It never encourages. It only tears you down—and convinces you it’s doing you a favor by doing so.

Where Does the TIC Come From?

The TIC is often a product of trauma—especially complex PTSD, which is sadly common among autistics and ADHDer.

Many of us grew up being told (directly or indirectly) that our needs were too much, our behavior was wrong, or that we simply didn’t belong. We learned to anticipate rejection. We started beating ourselves up before anyone else could.

The TIC tries to protect us by warning us away from risks and mistakes. But it does so by keeping us stuck in self-criticism, fear, and avoidance.

It whispers: “Stay small and safe. If you don’t try, you can’t fail.” But what it really steals is your chance to live fully.

How the TIC Shows Up in Neurodivergent Lives

The TIC isn’t just a voice in your head. It can shape your whole world.

🌀 You avoid trying new things because you expect failure.
🌀 You shrink your life down to what feels “safe.”
🌀 You internalize ableist standards and feel like you’re never enough.
🌀 You catastrophize even small mistakes—and spiral into shame.

The TIC thrives on old messages and assumptions. It echoes the voices of critical caregivers, teachers, peers, or society at large. And over time, it becomes so familiar that it feels like truth.

But it’s not the truth. It’s trauma.

You Are Not the TIC

Here’s the first thing to know: you are not your TIC.

It’s just one part of your inner experience—a scared, protective part. It’s not inherently evil or malicious. It’s just outdated. And it needs help learning a new role.

You don’t need to fight it. You can befriend it. Here’s how.

Essy Knopf tyrannical inner critic

7 Ways to Tame the Tyrannical Inner Critic

💬 Name it: Give your TIC a name or character. Naming creates distance and softens the power it holds.

🧠 Label it: Try saying, “My TIC is telling me that I’m going to fail.” This helps separate the thought from you. You are the observer—not the thought.

🧘‍♀️ Practice mindfulness: Ground yourself in the present with mindful breathing or sensory awareness. This calms the nervous system and gives you space to respond, not react.

🎭 Visualize a container: Imagine putting the TIC in a little box. Close the lid. When it pops back out (because it will), gently put it back in. Rinse and repeat.

✍️ Journal your TIC’s patterns: Writing down what your TIC says helps you spot its scripts—and challenge them over time.

🗣️ Talk back with compassion: Try saying: “Thanks for trying to protect me. I know you’re scared. But I can handle this now.” Self-kindness is your greatest tool here.

🤝 Connect with others: The TIC thrives in isolation. Talking to someone—a friend, therapist, or community member—can put your fears into perspective and remind you you’re not alone.

What the Tyrannical Inner Critic Doesn’t Want You to Know

The TIC does not want you recognize that mistakes are human, and growth requires risk. But the truth is, you can handle discomfort—and come out stronger. And you are worthy, just as you are.

The TIC wants you to play it safe—but at the cost of your joy, your potential, your freedom.

When you meet the TIC with empathy, you take back your power. You don’t have to believe everything it says. You get to choose what voice guides your life.

Final Thoughts

You may never completely silence the tyrannical inner critic. That’s okay. The goal isn’t to get rid of it—it’s to learn how to live alongside it with self-compassion and boundaries.

Because when you do, something magical happens: The TIC gets quieter. Your true voice gets louder. And you begin to build a life based not on fear, but on hope.

Do you recognize your TIC? What name would you give it? How have you learned to cope with its criticism?

How judgmentalism is ruining gay dating

Essy Knopf gay dating
Reading time: 6 minutes

Gay dating is riddled with pitfalls, but perhaps the most significant is the rampant judgmentalism we face – and inflict – upon one another.

The irony is that we approach dating expecting chemistry while treating each other in ways that make it almost impossible.

The catch-22 is that unless we feel safe unless we can let our guards down, we’re going to resist being vulnerable. And without vulnerability, there is no chemistry.

Judgment and gay dating

I met Bryce* one evening over boba tea. Bryce was a guitarist from the UK who had come to Los Angeles with big hopes of breaking into the music industry.

As we exchanged details about our lives, Bryce made a number of flattering remarks about my appearance, flashing flirtatious grins, while indicating he genuinely wanted to get to know me.

As our conversation rolled on, Bryce asked me about my family and we somehow got onto the subject of trust.

“I like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt,” Bryce said.

“That’s great,” I replied. “I used to be the same.”

Bryce looked at me, expectant. I smiled, explaining I had firsthand experience dealing with a relative who was a pathological liar and that this had left me somewhat wary.

Almost immediately the warmth left Bryce’s expression. I excused myself to use the restroom, and when I returned he asked to call it a night. 

Out in the car park, I offered Bryce a polite farewell hug.

“Oh, we’re going to hug, are we?” he sneered, then walked away.

I got into my car, confused. Had my comment had been mistimed? Had I overshared?

Even so, I couldn’t shake the feeling that no time would ever have been appropriate for such an admission.

For in opening up to Bryce, I had breached an unspoken code by which many gay men live: never expose your vulnerabilities.

Gay dating and expecting perfection

Being born gay almost always guarantees an inheritance of trauma or invalidation. Having been bullied and marginalized for our differences, in particular our emotional expressivity, we learn early on to hide these, lest others brand us “feminine”.

Some of us do this by constructing a perfect exterior, or by hiding behind keen wit, brand name wardrobes, gym-fit physiques, or career success. In many cases, this is the mark of insecurity, born of an unrelenting inner critic.

Deprived of self-compassion, we, in turn, become incapable of mustering empathy for others. When a romantic interest tries to be vulnerable with us, to let their imperfections hang out, there is a strong possibility we will treat this as an infraction.

Uncomfortable with the demands this vulnerability makes of our own, we – like Bryce – reach not for understanding, but dismissal. 

Thus, having ourselves been rejected for being our authentic selves, we come to reject others for what we perceive as their weaknesses or flaws.

I believe it’s for this reason that many of us choose hookups over dating. We’re even more likely to avoid connections if we have in the past put ourselves out there, only to be shut down.

Hookups furthermore validate. They offer us instant gratification while sparing us the emotional risks typically associated with relationships.

In her book Daring Greatly, Brené Brown notes that we commonly associate vulnerability with “dark emotions”. But so long as we remain terrified of recognizing, acknowledging, and discussing such emotions, they continue to exert significant control over all aspects of our lives.

Imperfection is a given

Most gay men will suffer some form of trauma and a degree of neuroticism by virtue of what we have lived through. Psychology Today defines neuroticism as “a tendency toward anxiety, depression, self-doubt, and other negative feelings”. 

Unfortunately, the popular doctrine of masculinity asks that we hide our anguish and struggles. Those who fail to do so are mocked and rejected. Social conditioning has more or less made emotional concealment a condition for acceptance as males.

But our wounds and imperfections are a fact of human existence, ones that will sooner or later be revealed in the course of dating.

While I believe this act of revealing should be treated as a generous gift and met with compassion and understanding, many of us resort instead to the scorn and rejection we ourselves have suffered.

When we do this, we don’t just perpetuate a cycle of harm – we render gay dating an exercise in futility,

Until we have learned to be comfortable with our wounds and to reintegrate that emotional part of our identity we have split off as a matter of acceptance and survival, we will not treat vulnerability with the honor it deserves.

And so the meaningful relationships we all ultimately desire will continue to elude us.

Use discernment, not judgment

When dating, judgment may serve as a valuable defense mechanism, allowing us to screen out people who may pose a threat to our interests.

The gay dating world is, after all, rife with people who are irresponsible in their actions, inconsistent in motive, and generally lacking self-awareness. 

This is especially true on gay dating apps, which cannot enforce personal accountability. People we’ve been engaging in a heartfelt chat with can, for example, decide to reject, ghost, or block us, often without an apparent cause or explanation.

It’s no wonder then our reaction is to always be protecting ourselves, yet there is a difference between preemptively attaching negative labels to someone and genuinely trying to understand and relate to them

To this end, first dates should be treated as much as an exercise in rapport-building as one in information gathering. We should work to learn about our date’s habits and character; to build a holistic assessment in the place of making a snap judgment.

Chemistry is important, certainly, but true chemistry is a slow-burn phenomenon that can only flourish under conditions of emotional safety. So we must first create a gay dating environment in which it can flourish.

We do this by choosing discernment over judgment.

essy knopf gay dating judgmentalism

Discernment in practice

Judgment is a process of assigning values and drawing conclusions, while discernment is a process of perceiving facts and making informed inferences

As a discerning dater, your job is to be on the lookout for discrepancies, causes for concern, differences, and dealbreakers.

Your date for example may tell you they find you very attractive. They may insist they are looking to date. But they may also label themselves a workaholic.

You will notice here a disparity between a stated desire and practiced action, one that seems to suggest this person may not really want to date. Dating, after all, would require that they be willing to shift gears; to consider putting people before things

Workaholics by definition neglect their own needs. They are therefore unlikely to have the mental bandwidth to accommodate another person’s needs. 

When a date defines themselves as a workaholic, they may be intentionally or unintentionally “Mirandizing” you. That is, they are reading you your rights as a romantic candidate, telling you what to expect. Namely, that their job will always come first. 

This kind of distancing behavior is often indicative of an avoidant attachment style, which does not bode well for most people seeking romantic fulfillment. 

If we probe a little deeper, workaholicism for many gay men is an expression of covert depression, masquerading as grandiosity. There is a possibility this person may have some challenges they need to work through.

Unless your date is taking proactive steps to help themselves, to be in a relationship with them may require that you be willing to accept – if not enable – their avoidance. 

By making observations about the facts presented here, I have practiced discernment.

But discernment also tells me that while my date has admitted to being a workaholic, this is a clue, not a conclusion. 

Keep on gathering intel

Red flags may leave you with reservations, but it is imperative to keep an open mind, while also looking for data that may contradict or confirm the evidence at hand.

In the situation above, you may subsequently learn your date was joking about being a workaholic, or that they are in fact willing, ready, and able to break the habit.

With positive discoveries like this, we may feel tempted to abandon our assessment. Still, information gathering is a process that cannot – and should not – be rushed when gay dating, lest we miss evidence of future problems.

After all, when meeting other gay men we tend to put our best foot forward – at least initially. Over time, our true nature seeps out through the chinks in our armor. Such glimpses of our true selves are often the most telling.

One of the perils of expediting assessment while dating is that we may overlook this true self. Or we may never even get the chance because we’ve already ruled that person out, thus missing out on the opportunity to connect with a possible kindred spirit.

For this reason, we must strive to recognize the commonality in our stories and to offer one another the compassion we are all seeking – and rightfully deserve.

Takeaways

  • Dysfunction and imperfection are universal.
  • By dismissing a date, we may be perpetuating harm we ourselves have suffered.
  • True chemistry only happens when we feel safe.
  • When we judge, we create a hostile environment that undermines vulnerability.
  • The alternative is to practice discernment, compassion, and empathy.

* Names and identifying details have been changed to protect the privacy of all individuals discussed in this article.